Loss at Salerno

 

(Report of loss by senior surviving officer)

On 2 April 1943 Lt. Joseph Orleck was ordered to Service Force, Atlantic Fleet for temporary service. Then, Joe Orleck took command of the recently commissioned USS NAUSET on 28 May 1943 at Mers-el-Kebir, Algeria. Less than four months later he was engaged in a battle for his life and the life of his ship. Both went down on that fateful day, 9 September 1943. Seven days later Ensign Edwin L. Reel, the Senior Surviving Officer, USS NAUSET (AT89) submitted an Action Report on the loss of the USS NAUSET. The following is that report almost in its entirety and it tells the story much better than anything else:

1. The U.S.S. NAUSET (AT89) left Bizerte, Tunisia, outer breakwater, at 0530 September 7, 1943, as part of Task Unit 85.1.1, Fss 2 Assault Group, to participate in attack of Salerno Bay, Italy, as part of the Combined Operations. This Convoy consisted of SOPA in U.S.S BISCAYNE, fifteen LST’s, U.S.S. NARRAGANSETT (AT88), and U.S.S. NAUSET (AT89). It was escorted by a group of PC’s and SC’s. Our cruising disposition was astern 350 yards and midway between columns one and two of three columns. Our cargo consisted of one Royal Navy Assault Craft (LCA) cradled on fantail and secured to main boom. The Assault Craft was equipped with Hedge Row and bombs. We also carried in the salvage hold one-quarter ton of TNT and one-quarter ton of dynamite. These explosives were to be used in salvage operations. Personnel aboard were twelve ship’s officers and one Royal Navy Officer, one hundred one ship’s enlisted personnel, and four Royal Navy enlisted personnel.

2. At approximately 1430, September 8, 1943, an enemy plane approached the convoy from out of the sun and dropped a bomb in the vicinity of the PC escorts on our starboard bow, distant about one thousand yards. The plane was fired on by ships in the convoy but no hits were observed. This ship did not open fire as identity was not established until plane was out of range. At 1530, September 8, 1943, a message was received from SOPA to form approach disposition as outlined in Operation Plan. This Order was complied with, and our new position was astern of LST 2, which was last in column one of two columns. At 1700, the ship went to general quarters in compliance with orders of SOPA as given by flag hoist. Maximum condition of readiness was observed from this time until the final disaster.

3. At about 2200, September 8, 1943, clusters of serial flares were dropped which illuminated the convoy. After the flares lighted up the vicinity of the convoy, bombs were dropped from enemy planes with no observed hits. Numbers of near misses were seen on certain units of the convoy. This ship did not open fire as no planes were seen or heard. Enemy air craft apparently attacked the convoy intermittently throughout the approach, because anti-aircraft fires were seen from various ships at frequent intervals.

4. At approximately 2330, September 8, 1943, the fifteen mile station ship was sighted. At 0000, September 9, 1943, the ten mile station ship was sighted on the approach course. At 0045, September 9, 1943, the six and one-half-mile station ship was sighted. In making approach to US lowering position as given in the Operation Plan in vicinity of the six and one-half-mile station ship, we commenced lowering the Royal Naval Assault Craft while lying to. It was 0230 when this operation was completed, and the craft shoved off with the Royal Navy officer and crew aboard. They were to make an approach and discharge Hedge Row bombs on designated beach as planned in the Operational Plan. Gunfire was observed intermittently along the beach in the approach area. We were lying to, awaiting the return of the assault craft to reload her with the second load of bombs. Our port anchor was walked out to thirty fathoms to act as a sea anchor and retard drifting.

5. At about 0430 antiaircraft fire was observed on our port quarter, distant one mile. This presumably was from radar-controlled guns as no flares or planes were seen or heard. The antiaircraft fire ceased after about ten rounds had been expended. This ship did not open fire for fear of revealing our position. At 0510, two or three heavy explosions were heard aboard or in the very near vicinity of this ship. The explosions were due to aerial bombs dropped from an enemy air craft. The plane was not seen by any member of the crew but was heard as it pulled out of its dive. This was just before the explosions occurred. The explosions caused fire to envelope the entire boat deck, also extended through passageways and up ladders to the chart room and bridge. Flames leaped in the air just aft of the bridge to a height of fifty feet. The ship immediately took a definite list to port of fifteen degrees. The explosions caused a power failure, and all lights, power, and internal communications went out. After order of the crew was restored following the explosions the Captain gave orders to stream the fire hoses. When hoses were streamed and water was called for none was present as all power was off and pressure was nil. All fire plugs were tested for pressure and no pressure was found on any of them. All guns were inoperative due to the explosions and fire being in the vicinity. Personnel at their gun stations were injured, blown overboard by the explosions, or suffering from extreme shock and burns. The motor launch was suspended over the port side from the boat boom, caused by the explosions. Due to lack of power and bent davits, it was impossible to lower either boat. Orders were given to cut lashings on all life rafts immediately. Clusters of flares were dropped, lighting up the entire area. Bombs fell, but no hits were observed. Extensive antiaircraft fire was in progress from ships in the area. This probably prevented another attack on the ship.

6. The U.S.S. INTENT was, at the time the explosions occurred, on the port bow about 800 yards distant. The INTENT stood our way immediately after the explosions to assist in any way possible. When she was in hailing distance, our Captain told her to come along our starboard side, the idea being to use her fire mains and to remove injured personnel, also to tow us into shallow water. One fire hose was streamed from the INTENT’s fire main in an attempt to extinguish the flames. One handy billy was also put into operation from our ship after numerous attempts to start it had failed. It was difficult to maneuver due to inability to bring rudder from hard left. The injured personnel were transferred aboard the INTENT where first aid was rendered to those that were suffering most. Most of the injuries received were severe burns of face and arms. A complete search of all accessible compartments of the ship was made by officers and crew who were not injured for additional survivors. In this search, it was found that the generator room and motor room were flooded with water and burning fuel oil, and it was impossible to enter. It is believed that all missing personnel in these two rooms were killed by the initial explosions. One officer was among the injured who was in the motor room at the time the explosions occurred, and is the only person to escape from these compartments as far as is known. Others who were in this area are missing, and definitely believed dead due to the initial explosions and resulting fires. In the inspection at Frame 57 and in adjoining areas were buckled, and seams had opened from eight to fourteen inches. A bend in the starboard side of the hull was observed above the water line and extended about six feet in toward the keel from its normal position. A definite sag amidships signified that the keel was broken by the explosions.

7. The fires on the boat deck and topside were under control, but those in the motor and generator rooms still burned. This below-decks fire was fought by the hoses from the INTENT and handy billy but with very little success, due to the insufficient volume of water. At this time, the ship took another definite list to port, and the port quarter was awash. The bow also was down so that water was level with the hawse pipe. Water was entering rapidly, and the ship was settling lower. The Captain gave the order for all hands to abandon ship. Those on board abandoned ship and transferred to the INTENT. When all hands were off, men stood by tow lines with axes to cut lines if the ship sank. The ship then righted itself to about a twenty degree list, and hopes arose with all concerned because it was thought that it could be beached. The Captain then sent a message to the U.S.S. NARRAGANSETT which was sighted on our port quarter to come alongside port side to assist the INTENT in beaching us. This message was sent by blinker. The NARRAGANSETT immediately stood our way to assist. Our Captain, First Lieutenant, and Chief Boatswain’s mate reboarded our ship to make lines fast from the NARRAGANSETT when she came alongside.

8. When the NARRAGANSETT was about 500 yards off our port quarter, another violent explosion occurred near the bow of the NAUSET. Existing conditions indicated that the explosion was due to a mine, as further developments proved that the ship was in a mine field. There were no explosives in the forward hold, and the magazine was not in the vicinity of the fire, which tends to substantiate this fact. After this explosion, the NAUSET broke in half and sank. The bow and stern were the last to go under, sinking in about ten seconds after the last explosion. This was about 0605 September 9, 1943, nearly an hour after the initial explosions. The U.S.S. NAUSET sank in sixty-five fathoms of water in Latitude 40 degrees 38’N., Longitude 14 degrees 38′ E., as taken from the chart Number 3944.

9. The last explosion blew men from the fantail of the INTENT into the water. Debris from the sunken ship came to the surface and the men in the water grabbed it to remain afloat until the NARRAGANSETT, who was continuing to stand our way, picked them up. The NARRAGANSETT also put their whale boat in the water to assist in rescuing all survivors. After a thorough search of the area, and all men of the surface had been picked up and put aboard the NARRAGANSETT, it was discovered that the Captain and the First Lieutenant of the sunken NAUSET were not aboard. The NARRAGANSETT’s whale boat was then sent back to make another search as it was now daylight. This second search failed to locate them or anyone else in the water. The Captain and the First Lieutenant were last seen on the forecastle of the NAUSET with the Chief Boatswain’s Mate, awaiting the NARRAGANSETT to come alongside. This was before the final explosion. The Chief Boatswain’s Mate was picked up by the INTENT after the sinking.

Edwin L. Reel Ensign D-V(S), U.S.N.R.

  13 Responses to “Loss at Salerno”

  1. I see that this coming Sept. 9 will be the 80th anniversary of the loss of the USS Nauset, Lt. Orleck, the First Lt. And the others. I’m hoping we can commemorate that day here in Jacksonville, FL.
    (From Allen Myrick, ship maint. and Docent-in-training 😊).

  2. My Father, Richard C Beckerich, was onboard this ship then and sustained extensive burns as well as shrapnel in his left shoulder. After 9 months in the hospital, he was offered a medical discharge from the Navy. He refused and went on to complete his tour. He was a proud member of the Under Water Demolishing Team (UDT). The precursor to the Navy Seals.

  3. I believe my father Donald L. Hurley was on the Nauset the morning she went down. I think his position was Firemen 3rd Class, dad was a survivor but was burned extremely bad on his entire right side of his body. When he came back from the war he met my mother and they had 12 kids together, we are all still alive thank God. In my younger days I would ask my father about the war, his almost constant reply was “it was bad”, and that’s all he would say. Is there a ship’s roster with all the crew aboard when she was sank? Thanks again for posting this information.

  4. I believe my father Donald L. Hurley was on the Nauset the morning she went down. I think his position was Firemen 3rd Class, dad was a survivor but was burned extremely bad on his entire right side of his body. When he came back from the war he met my mother and they had 12 kids together, we are all still alive thank God.

  5. Hello, my name is Allen Myrick, I live in Yulee, FL (20 mi north of Jacksonville, FL). I started volunteering on board the USS Orleck this week, doing maintenance work on Mondays.
    I’m trying to figure out something…. Joseph Orleck’s birth date. Various sources list it as
    January 22, 1906.
    But a photo of his headstone in Arlington National Cemetery shows June 22, 1906. Can anyone explain the difference?

    https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2008/32/24325344_120199301919.jpg

    Also interesting to note the date of death on the headstone is One Year, One Day after the attack, so they used the Date he was declared dead from the US Navy on the headstone.

  6. Hello all,
    My dad, Edwin Reel, is the one that had to write this report. He never would talk about it much saying he saw enough death to last 5 lifetimes. He did tell me that after they all abandoned ship, he held a shipmate up until they were rescued since the mate could not buckle his life jacket due to serious chest wounds. I remember us getting Christmas cards from him for years…but I can not remember his name.
    This was a sad day!!!

    • I am so glad to hear from you. I read that report many times. I would love to be in further contact with you. My email is bob@ussorleck.com. That is a wonderful thing your Dad did and I am sure there were other things he did as well. Please stay in touch and maybe you might want to consider attending one of our reunions. Bob Orleck

  7. Hello, my Uncle Robert Shrader (born 04/26/1915) died on the USS Nauset 09/09/1943 , in Salerno, Italy and that\’s all I know, would love more info about this, if possible. Thank you in advance.

    • So young to die. I am sorry you did not get to know your uncle assuming you were probably either born around or after he died in 1943. I was one year old when my uncle, Lt. Joseph Orleck went down with his ship, the USS NAUSET AT 89. Have you reviewed the website? There is mention o the NAUSET and her going down. There is a report of the senior surviving officer that spells out in detail the happenings that fateful day. We had a reunion in Wilmington NC in 2006 and our guest speaker was Bill Mutert. He was the on the bridge often with my uncle and he recounted the last minutes of their lives. Said that his Captain had gotten the survivors off onto other ships and returned to receive lines when the ship appeared to be stabilizing but then hit a mine and as he said, “I saw my Captain and my ship disappear.”

      • Thank you , so very much for sharing the website. It’s very helpful, and I greatly appreciate it!!

  8. My father, Emmanuel (jJohn) Mello, was the Chief Boatswain’s Mate. He retired from the Navy as an LCDR at his last duty station – the U.S. Naval Gun Factory, Washington, D.C., IN 1955.

    • Hi Edward: I approved your post for the site. I am the nephew of the namesake, Lt. Joseph Orleck, of the USS ORLECK and I do the website and have done reunions for the men for 23 years. I tried to find your father’s name on our roster but he is not there. We had to search out each of her men and we only found 2200 of the over 4000 that served aboard her. If you know he served on USS ORLECK, I will add him to our Roster and if deceased to our Memorial Roster. Let me know and I will take the necessary action. I would like the years he served aboard USS ORLECK and what his rate/rank was when he left. If you don’t know that, let me know as well. I will be looking forward to your reply. Bob Orleck

  9. My uncle, James Graham Keep, also died on the Nauset.

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)